FEATURED

Buy the Cake book!

at CAKE
or on Amazon

NEW!
GOT A QUESTION YOU ARE DYING TO ASK CAKE?
DEAR CAKE - SUBMIT A QUESTION NOW!

NEW!
FEELING JUICY?
Fantasy, Experience, Pleasure
Surrender The Pink - Submit yours now

HOT STUFF!
COMPLETE THE CAKE REPORT NOW!

BE OUR FRIEND!
CAKE MYSPACE
CAKE BOYS
CAKE SF

CLUB CAKE Photos on FLICKR

CLUB CAKE Video on YouTube

Login

Don’t have a username and a password?
Subscribe to CAKE – it’s free!

Username:
Password:

Search

 

The Boobie Wars


By melinda, Section Love, Melinda
Posted on Fri Jun 16, 2006 at 03:36:26 PM EST

Breast feed or else? The Times seems to think that women realistically have that choice.

An article in the New York Times this week asserts that “"Just like it's risky to smoke during pregnancy, it's risky not to breast-feed after." Um - wtf? So the implication is that if women don’t breast feed, we are criminally negligent? As Lori Leibovich notes in Salon, the boobie wars are in full effect:

“Yes, it would be great if more women breast-fed their babies. And I guess it's nice that the government is reminding women of the benefits of breast milk. But in their heavy-handed, bullying approach, these ads are like the lactation equivalent of the this-is-your-brain-on-drugs ads of the 1980s. The difference is that nobody has to smoke dope, but many women do have to work. The campaign willfully ignores the reality of most women's lives. The fact is, real barriers, both physical and financial, stand between many mothers and breast-feeding -- a fact the Times quickly glided over. Not one breast-feeding proponent interviewed, for example, was asked to explain how the more than 60 percent of mothers of young children who work are supposed to exclusively breast-feed for the recommended six months. Nor did they comment on the fact that even if a woman is fortunate enough to afford to take the 12 unpaid weeks of leave mandated by the Family and Medical Leave Act, she still will fall short. No experts were asked about the role of race and class in breast-feeding, even though the Times article noted that black women are less likely to breast-feed and that the rate of breast-feeding increases with education, income and age -- presumably because those are the women who have the resources and support to do it.

It's really infuriating. The same government that's warning women that they're risking their children's lives if they don't breast-feed makes it almost impossible to do so by not providing them with mandatory paid maternity leave. The Times interviewed one mother who characterized breast-feeding as a "lifestyle" and admitted that her life "revolves around my kids, basically." But few women have the option to make that kind of lifestyle choice, no matter how much they might want to.”

Amen to that - its about time our society value women’s work, lives, and reproductive choices.

< Hillary Clinton gets it right when it comes to preventing unwanted pregnancies | Be Our Friend! >

Front Page

Monday February 4th
The first time with a friend (0 comments)
Tuesday January 22nd
After hours (0 comments)
Thursday January 17th
Best Kept Secrets - from the CAKE Report (1 comments)
Monday January 14th
Books You'll Love (0 comments)
Friday January 11th
A Day in the Park (0 comments)
Wednesday January 9th
Strip Club Blues (0 comments)
Tuesday October 23rd
COVERAGE OF CAKE EDEN - a devil's night masquerade on October 30th! (0 comments)
Friday October 19th
SAVE THE DATE!!! - OCTOBER 30TH (0 comments)
Thursday September 27th
Let's hear it from the boys (0 comments)
Thursday September 6th
Working Grrrls (0 comments)
Older Stories...
Copyright © CAKE, L.L.C. 2000-2005 All rights reserved
Please read terms of service